↓ Skip to main content

Principles of regulatory information conservation between mouse and human

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
20 X users
patent
1 patent
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
658 Mendeley
citeulike
9 CiteULike
Title
Principles of regulatory information conservation between mouse and human
Published in
Nature, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13985
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong Cheng, Zhihai Ma, Bong-Hyun Kim, Weisheng Wu, Philip Cayting, Alan P. Boyle, Vasavi Sundaram, Xiaoyun Xing, Nergiz Dogan, Jingjing Li, Ghia Euskirchen, Shin Lin, Yiing Lin, Axel Visel, Trupti Kawli, Xinqiong Yang, Dorrelyn Patacsil, Cheryl A. Keller, Belinda Giardine, The Mouse ENCODE Consortium, Anshul Kundaje, Ting Wang, Len A. Pennacchio, Zhiping Weng, Ross C. Hardison, Michael P. Snyder

Abstract

To broaden our understanding of the evolution of gene regulation mechanisms, we generated occupancy profiles for 34 orthologous transcription factors (TFs) in human-mouse erythroid progenitor, lymphoblast and embryonic stem-cell lines. By combining the genome-wide transcription factor occupancy repertoires, associated epigenetic signals, and co-association patterns, here we deduce several evolutionary principles of gene regulatory features operating since the mouse and human lineages diverged. The genomic distribution profiles, primary binding motifs, chromatin states, and DNA methylation preferences are well conserved for TF-occupied sequences. However, the extent to which orthologous DNA segments are bound by orthologous TFs varies both among TFs and with genomic location: binding at promoters is more highly conserved than binding at distal elements. Notably, occupancy-conserved TF-occupied sequences tend to be pleiotropic; they function in several tissues and also co-associate with many TFs. Single nucleotide variants at sites with potential regulatory functions are enriched in occupancy-conserved TF-occupied sequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 658 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 16 2%
France 5 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Korea, Republic of 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 9 1%
Unknown 610 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 178 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 165 25%
Student > Bachelor 51 8%
Student > Master 46 7%
Professor 39 6%
Other 111 17%
Unknown 68 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 278 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 163 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 6%
Computer Science 24 4%
Neuroscience 16 2%
Other 62 9%
Unknown 76 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2022.
All research outputs
#302,582
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#16,364
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,311
of 376,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#240
of 970 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 970 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.