↓ Skip to main content

Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
33 X users
patent
68 patents
weibo
8 weibo users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
959 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1342 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Predicting immunogenic tumour mutations by combining mass spectrometry and exome sequencing
Published in
Nature, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature14001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mahesh Yadav, Suchit Jhunjhunwala, Qui T. Phung, Patrick Lupardus, Joshua Tanguay, Stephanie Bumbaca, Christian Franci, Tommy K. Cheung, Jens Fritsche, Toni Weinschenk, Zora Modrusan, Ira Mellman, Jennie R. Lill, Lélia Delamarre

Abstract

Human tumours typically harbour a remarkable number of somatic mutations. If presented on major histocompatibility complex class I molecules (MHCI), peptides containing these mutations could potentially be immunogenic as they should be recognized as 'non-self' neo-antigens by the adaptive immune system. Recent work has confirmed that mutant peptides can serve as T-cell epitopes. However, few mutant epitopes have been described because their discovery required the laborious screening of patient tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes for their ability to recognize antigen libraries constructed following tumour exome sequencing. We sought to simplify the discovery of immunogenic mutant peptides by characterizing their general properties. We developed an approach that combines whole-exome and transcriptome sequencing analysis with mass spectrometry to identify neo-epitopes in two widely used murine tumour models. Of the >1,300 amino acid changes identified, ∼13% were predicted to bind MHCI, a small fraction of which were confirmed by mass spectrometry. The peptides were then structurally modelled bound to MHCI. Mutations that were solvent-exposed and therefore accessible to T-cell antigen receptors were predicted to be immunogenic. Vaccination of mice confirmed the approach, with each predicted immunogenic peptide yielding therapeutically active T-cell responses. The predictions also enabled the generation of peptide-MHCI dextramers that could be used to monitor the kinetics and distribution of the anti-tumour T-cell response before and after vaccination. These findings indicate that a suitable prediction algorithm may provide an approach for the pharmacodynamic monitoring of T-cell responses as well as for the development of personalized vaccines in cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,342 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 <1%
France 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 1318 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 319 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 290 22%
Student > Master 116 9%
Student > Bachelor 106 8%
Other 100 7%
Other 187 14%
Unknown 224 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 314 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 245 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 195 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 188 14%
Chemistry 35 3%
Other 116 9%
Unknown 249 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2024.
All research outputs
#354,757
of 25,848,962 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#18,281
of 98,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,931
of 372,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#277
of 973 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,848,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 973 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.