↓ Skip to main content

Precision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant using cold atoms

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
49 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
528 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Precision measurement of the Newtonian gravitational constant using cold atoms
Published in
Nature, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13433
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Rosi, F. Sorrentino, L. Cacciapuoti, M. Prevedelli, G. M. Tino

Abstract

About 300 experiments have tried to determine the value of the Newtonian gravitational constant, G, so far, but large discrepancies in the results have made it impossible to know its value precisely. The weakness of the gravitational interaction and the impossibility of shielding the effects of gravity make it very difficult to measure G while keeping systematic effects under control. Most previous experiments performed were based on the torsion pendulum or torsion balance scheme as in the experiment by Cavendish in 1798, and in all cases macroscopic masses were used. Here we report the precise determination of G using laser-cooled atoms and quantum interferometry. We obtain the value G = 6.67191(99) × 10(-11) m(3) kg(-1) s(-2) with a relative uncertainty of 150 parts per million (the combined standard uncertainty is given in parentheses). Our value differs by 1.5 combined standard deviations from the current recommended value of the Committee on Data for Science and Technology. A conceptually different experiment such as ours helps to identify the systematic errors that have proved elusive in previous experiments, thus improving the confidence in the value of G. There is no definitive relationship between G and the other fundamental constants, and there is no theoretical prediction for its value, against which to test experimental results. Improving the precision with which we know G has not only a pure metrological interest, but is also important because of the key role that G has in theories of gravitation, cosmology, particle physics and astrophysics and in geophysical models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
United Kingdom 7 3%
Germany 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 240 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 29%
Researcher 61 23%
Professor 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Student > Master 19 7%
Other 36 14%
Unknown 28 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 197 74%
Engineering 11 4%
Chemistry 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 1%
Social Sciences 3 1%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 31 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 195. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#197,289
of 24,981,585 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#11,889
of 96,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,528
of 233,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#138
of 1,014 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,981,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,014 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.