↓ Skip to main content

Functional organization of excitatory synaptic strength in primary visual cortex

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
481 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
922 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Functional organization of excitatory synaptic strength in primary visual cortex
Published in
Nature, February 2015
DOI 10.1038/nature14182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee Cossell, Maria Florencia Iacaruso, Dylan R. Muir, Rachael Houlton, Elie N. Sader, Ho Ko, Sonja B. Hofer, Thomas D. Mrsic-Flogel

Abstract

The strength of synaptic connections fundamentally determines how neurons influence each other's firing. Excitatory connection amplitudes between pairs of cortical neurons vary over two orders of magnitude, comprising only very few strong connections among many weaker ones. Although this highly skewed distribution of connection strengths is observed in diverse cortical areas, its functional significance remains unknown: it is not clear how connection strength relates to neuronal response properties, nor how strong and weak inputs contribute to information processing in local microcircuits. Here we reveal that the strength of connections between layer 2/3 (L2/3) pyramidal neurons in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) obeys a simple rule--the few strong connections occur between neurons with most correlated responses, while only weak connections link neurons with uncorrelated responses. Moreover, we show that strong and reciprocal connections occur between cells with similar spatial receptive field structure. Although weak connections far outnumber strong connections, each neuron receives the majority of its local excitation from a small number of strong inputs provided by the few neurons with similar responses to visual features. By dominating recurrent excitation, these infrequent yet powerful inputs disproportionately contribute to feature preference and selectivity. Therefore, our results show that the apparently complex organization of excitatory connection strength reflects the similarity of neuronal responses, and suggest that rare, strong connections mediate stimulus-specific response amplification in cortical microcircuits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 922 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 1%
Germany 8 <1%
France 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 10 1%
Unknown 873 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 290 31%
Researcher 198 21%
Student > Master 91 10%
Student > Bachelor 71 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 4%
Other 131 14%
Unknown 100 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 340 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 268 29%
Physics and Astronomy 42 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 3%
Psychology 29 3%
Other 91 10%
Unknown 120 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 December 2023.
All research outputs
#294,449
of 25,210,618 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#16,078
of 96,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,646
of 363,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#303
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,210,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.