| Title |
Bayes' theorem
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature Methods, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3335 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jorge López Puga, Martin Krzywinski, Naomi Altman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| Spain | 7 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 37 | 67% |
| Scientists | 16 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,012 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 23 | 2% |
| Spain | 9 | <1% |
| Germany | 7 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Sweden | 4 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Chile | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 31 | 3% |
| Unknown | 919 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 266 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 260 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 97 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 71 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 52 | 5% |
| Other | 181 | 18% |
| Unknown | 85 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 347 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 157 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 79 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 50 | 5% |
| Engineering | 38 | 4% |
| Other | 217 | 21% |
| Unknown | 124 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,084,721
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,409
of 5,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,452
of 283,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#27
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.