| Title |
Single-cell magnetic imaging using a quantum diamond microscope
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Methods, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3449 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David R Glenn, Kyungheon Lee, Hongkun Park, Ralph Weissleder, Amir Yacoby, Mikhail D Lukin, Hakho Lee, Ronald L Walsworth, Colin B Connolly |
| Abstract |
We apply a quantum diamond microscope for detection and imaging of immunomagnetically labeled cells. This instrument uses nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond for correlated magnetic and fluorescence imaging. Our device provides single-cell resolution and a field of view (∼1 mm(2)) two orders of magnitude larger than that of previous NV imaging technologies, enabling practical applications. To illustrate, we quantified cancer biomarkers expressed by rare tumor cells in a large population of healthy cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 31% |
| Japan | 2 | 15% |
| Finland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 69% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 319 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 309 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 27% |
| Researcher | 58 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 42 | 13% |
| Unknown | 52 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 133 | 42% |
| Engineering | 38 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 38 | 12% |
| Unknown | 62 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2023.
All research outputs
#714,951
of 23,946,786 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#943
of 5,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,596
of 267,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#18
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,946,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.