| Title |
The genome sequences of Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis, the diploid ancestors of cultivated peanut
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.3517 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David John Bertioli, Steven B Cannon, Lutz Froenicke, Guodong Huang, Andrew D Farmer, Ethalinda K S Cannon, Xin Liu, Dongying Gao, Josh Clevenger, Sudhansu Dash, Longhui Ren, Márcio C Moretzsohn, Kenta Shirasawa, Wei Huang, Bruna Vidigal, Brian Abernathy, Ye Chu, Chad E Niederhuth, Pooja Umale, Ana Cláudia G Araújo, Alexander Kozik, Kyung Do Kim, Mark D Burow, Rajeev K Varshney, Xingjun Wang, Xinyou Zhang, Noelle Barkley, Patrícia M Guimarães, Sachiko Isobe, Baozhu Guo, Boshou Liao, H Thomas Stalker, Robert J Schmitz, Brian E Scheffler, Soraya C M Leal-Bertioli, Xu Xun, Scott A Jackson, Richard Michelmore, Peggy Ozias-Akins |
| Abstract |
Cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea) is an allotetraploid with closely related subgenomes of a total size of ∼2.7 Gb. This makes the assembly of chromosomal pseudomolecules very challenging. As a foundation to understanding the genome of cultivated peanut, we report the genome sequences of its diploid ancestors (Arachis duranensis and Arachis ipaensis). We show that these genomes are similar to cultivated peanut's A and B subgenomes and use them to identify candidate disease resistance genes, to guide tetraploid transcript assemblies and to detect genetic exchange between cultivated peanut's subgenomes. On the basis of remarkably high DNA identity of the A. ipaensis genome and the B subgenome of cultivated peanut and biogeographic evidence, we conclude that A. ipaensis may be a direct descendant of the same population that contributed the B subgenome to cultivated peanut. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 13% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 38 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 48% |
| Scientists | 39 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 445 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 435 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 87 | 20% |
| Researcher | 83 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 46 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 74 | 17% |
| Unknown | 101 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 245 | 55% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 69 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 3 | <1% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Engineering | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 111 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 212. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#182,900
of 25,392,205 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#277
of 7,567 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,112
of 310,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#7
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,567 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.