| Title |
Assembly and operation of the autopatcher for automated intracellular neural recording in vivo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Protocols, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nprot.2016.007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Suhasa B Kodandaramaiah, Gregory L Holst, Ian R Wickersham, Annabelle C Singer, Giovanni Talei Franzesi, Michael L McKinnon, Craig R Forest, Edward S Boyden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 40% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 36% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 33% |
| Researcher | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 45 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 19% |
| Engineering | 25 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,987,224
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#744
of 2,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,266
of 316,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#22
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,977 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.