| Title |
Raise standards for preclinical cancer research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/483531a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Glenn Begley, Lee M. Ellis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 955 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 152 | 16% |
| United States | 112 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 41 | 4% |
| Australia | 13 | 1% |
| Germany | 13 | 1% |
| Canada | 11 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 7 | <1% |
| France | 7 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 75 | 8% |
| Unknown | 518 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 802 | 84% |
| Scientists | 116 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 19 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,014 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 69 | 3% |
| Germany | 19 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | <1% |
| Denmark | 6 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 28 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1862 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 421 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 388 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 205 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 190 | 9% |
| Other | 144 | 7% |
| Other | 351 | 17% |
| Unknown | 315 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 388 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 244 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 224 | 11% |
| Psychology | 95 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 87 | 4% |
| Other | 574 | 29% |
| Unknown | 402 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2423. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2024.
All research outputs
#3,302
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#345
of 98,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 173,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#1
of 1,038 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,038 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.