| Title |
Logistic regression
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature Methods, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nmeth.3904 |
| Authors |
Jake Lever, Martin Krzywinski, Naomi Altman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 15 | 37% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 29 | 71% |
| Scientists | 12 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | 1% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 296 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 73 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 46 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 44 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 22 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 7% |
| Engineering | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 24% |
| Unknown | 56 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,514,973
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#1,823
of 5,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,541
of 367,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#25
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.