| Title |
Accretion of Phobos and Deimos in an extended debris disc stirred by transient moons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Geoscience, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ngeo2742 |
| Authors |
Pascal Rosenblatt, Sébastien Charnoz, Kevin M. Dunseath, Mariko Terao-Dunseath, Antony Trinh, Ryuki Hyodo, Hidenori Genda, Stéven Toupin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 16% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Thailand | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 75% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 30 | 37% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 19 | 23% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 780. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#24,643
of 25,452,734 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#73
of 3,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#421
of 369,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,452,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.