↓ Skip to main content

Rolling back malaria

Overview of attention for article published in eLife, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Rolling back malaria
Published in
eLife, March 2015
DOI 10.7554/elife.07364
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philippa C Matthews

Abstract

Efforts to fight malaria in Africa are proving successful in many countries, but a population explosion means that there is still a long way to go.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 30%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 11 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#6,099,511
of 22,797,621 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#9,727
of 13,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,522
of 263,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#136
of 223 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,797,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,814 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.9. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 223 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.