↓ Skip to main content

PNAS

Candida albicans Dicer (CaDcr1) is required for efficient ribosomal and spliceosomal RNA maturation

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
Candida albicans Dicer (CaDcr1) is required for efficient ribosomal and spliceosomal RNA maturation
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2011
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1118859109
Pubmed ID
Authors

Douglas A. Bernstein, Valmik K. Vyas, David E. Weinberg, Ines A. Drinnenberg, David P. Bartel, Gerald R. Fink

Abstract

The generation of mature functional RNAs from nascent transcripts requires the precise and coordinated action of numerous RNAs and proteins. One such protein family, the ribonuclease III (RNase III) endonucleases, includes Rnt1, which functions in fungal ribosome and spliceosome biogenesis, and Dicer, which generates the siRNAs of the RNAi pathway. The recent discovery of small RNAs in Candida albicans led us to investigate the function of C. albicans Dicer (CaDcr1). CaDcr1 is capable of generating siRNAs in vitro and is required for siRNA generation in vivo. In addition, CaDCR1 complements a Dicer knockout in Saccharomyces castellii, restoring RNAi-mediated gene repression. Unexpectedly, deletion of the C. albicans CaDCR1 results in a severe slow-growth phenotype, whereas deletion of another core component of the RNAi pathway (CaAGO1) has little effect on growth, suggesting that CaDCR1 may have an essential function in addition to producing siRNAs. Indeed CaDcr1, the sole functional RNase III enzyme in C. albicans, has additional functions: it is required for cleavage of the 3' external transcribed spacer from unprocessed pre-rRNA and for processing the 3' tail of snRNA U4. Our results suggest two models whereby the RNase III enzymes of a fungal ancestor, containing both a canonical Dicer and Rnt1, evolved through a series of gene-duplication and gene-loss events to generate the variety of RNase III enzymes found in modern-day budding yeasts.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 32%
Researcher 18 18%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 10 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Chemistry 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#8,219,054
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#64,491
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,614
of 251,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#519
of 783 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 783 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.