↓ Skip to main content

Science

Changes in Seismic Anisotropy Shed Light on the Nature of the Gutenberg Discontinuity

Overview of attention for article published in Science, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Changes in Seismic Anisotropy Shed Light on the Nature of the Gutenberg Discontinuity
Published in
Science, February 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1246724
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline Beghein, Kaiqing Yuan, Nicholas Schmerr, Zheng Xing

Abstract

The boundary between the lithosphere and asthenosphere is associated with a platewide high-seismic velocity "lid" overlying lowered velocities, consistent with thermal models. Seismic body waves also intermittently detect a sharp velocity reduction at similar depths, the Gutenberg (G) discontinuity, which cannot be explained by temperature alone. We compared an anisotropic tomography model with detections of the G to evaluate their context and relation to the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB). We find that the G is primarily associated with vertical changes in azimuthal anisotropy and lies above a thermally controlled LAB, implying that the two are not equivalent interfaces. The origin of the G is a result of frozen-in lithospheric structures, regional compositional variations of the mantle, or dynamically perturbed LAB.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Ireland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 108 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 28%
Researcher 15 13%
Professor 15 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 95 83%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Psychology 1 <1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 13 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2014.
All research outputs
#951,547
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Science
#18,322
of 82,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,220
of 235,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#173
of 840 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 840 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.