| Title |
Big data meets public health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaa2709 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Muin J Khoury, John P A Ioannidis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 169 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 52 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 9% |
| Australia | 7 | 4% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 2% |
| India | 4 | 2% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Unknown | 63 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 107 | 63% |
| Scientists | 35 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 572 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 536 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 109 | 19% |
| Researcher | 103 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 8% |
| Professor | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 132 | 23% |
| Unknown | 83 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 109 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 69 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 48 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 7% |
| Engineering | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 151 | 26% |
| Unknown | 125 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2022.
All research outputs
#320,257
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#8,528
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,546
of 374,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#99
of 824 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,968 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 824 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.