Title |
Two-pore channels control Ebola virus host cell entry and are drug targets for disease treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Science, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1126/science.1258758 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yasuteru Sakurai, Andrey A Kolokoltsov, Cheng-Chang Chen, Michael W Tidwell, William E Bauta, Norbert Klugbauer, Christian Grimm, Christian Wahl-Schott, Martin Biel, Robert A Davey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 13 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 5% |
Spain | 3 | 5% |
Belgium | 2 | 3% |
France | 2 | 3% |
Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Unknown | 24 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 42 | 70% |
Scientists | 14 | 23% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 382 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 379 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 84 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 64 | 17% |
Researcher | 44 | 12% |
Student > Master | 38 | 10% |
Professor | 18 | 5% |
Other | 55 | 14% |
Unknown | 79 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 22% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 70 | 18% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 33 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 22 | 6% |
Other | 51 | 13% |
Unknown | 90 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 285. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2023.
All research outputs
#123,984
of 25,397,764 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,955
of 82,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,302
of 270,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#98
of 1,381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,397,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 82,955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.