| Title |
Creating a safe operating space for iconic ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.aaa3769 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Scheffer, S Barrett, S R Carpenter, C Folke, A J Green, M Holmgren, T P Hughes, S Kosten, I A van de Leemput, D C Nepstad, E H van Nes, E T H M Peeters, B Walker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 120 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 18 | 15% |
| United States | 13 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 9% |
| Spain | 8 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
| Sweden | 3 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Curaçao | 1 | <1% |
| Ecuador | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 48 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 55% |
| Scientists | 43 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
| Researcher | 18 | 15% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 41 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2022.
All research outputs
#198,051
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Science
#5,716
of 83,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,143
of 280,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#136
of 1,360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.