You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the efficacy of oral immunotherapy for the desensitisation of peanut allergy in children (STOP II): a phase 2 randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62301-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine Anagnostou, Sabita Islam, Yvonne King, Loraine Foley, Laura Pasea, Simon Bond, Chris Palmer, John Deighton, Pamela Ewan, Andrew Clark |
| Abstract |
Small studies suggest peanut oral immunotherapy (OIT) might be effective in the treatment of peanut allergy. We aimed to establish the efficacy of OIT for the desensitisation of children with allergy to peanuts. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 167 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 39 | 23% |
| United States | 29 | 17% |
| Canada | 8 | 5% |
| Spain | 8 | 5% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| Japan | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 47 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 117 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 14% |
| Scientists | 19 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 387 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 45 | 11% |
| Other | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 10% |
| Other | 73 | 18% |
| Unknown | 96 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 117 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 47 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 59 | 15% |
| Unknown | 109 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 731. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2023.
All research outputs
#27,891
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#643
of 43,003 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175
of 326,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#4
of 506 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,003 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 506 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.