You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An assessment of progress towards universal health coverage in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60075-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Marten, Diane McIntyre, Claudia Travassos, Sergey Shishkin, Wang Longde, Srinath Reddy, Jeanette Vega |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 97 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 9% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 66 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 16% |
| Scientists | 14 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 579 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 566 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 137 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 69 | 12% |
| Researcher | 56 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 100 | 17% |
| Unknown | 126 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 128 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 85 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 53 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 42 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 38 | 7% |
| Other | 86 | 15% |
| Unknown | 147 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#436,477
of 25,755,403 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#4,201
of 42,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,698
of 242,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#45
of 439 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,755,403 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 439 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.