You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Disease-free survival after complete mesocolic excision compared with conventional colon cancer surgery: a retrospective, population-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Oncology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)71168-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claus Anders Bertelsen, Anders Ulrich Neuenschwander, Jens Erik Jansen, Michael Wilhelmsen, Anders Kirkegaard-Klitbo, Jutaka Reilin Tenma, Birgitte Bols, Peter Ingeholm, Leif Ahrenst Rasmussen, Lars Vedel Jepsen, Else Refsgaard Iversen, Bent Kristensen, Ismail Gögenur, on the behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 20% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 63 | 25% |
| Unknown | 53 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 146 | 58% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 73 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,827,527
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#1,935
of 6,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,105
of 364,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#35
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,958 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.