↓ Skip to main content

WHO must remain a strong global health leader post Ebola

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, January 2015
Altmetric Badge
92

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
122 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
WHO must remain a strong global health leader post Ebola
Published in
The Lancet, January 2015
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60012-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam Kamradt-Scott, Sophie Harman, Joao Nunes, Anne Roemer-Mahler, Clare Wenham, on behalf of 95 signatories

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 122 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Cambodia 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 23%
Researcher 8 18%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 27%
Social Sciences 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 10 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#470,476
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#4,454
of 43,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,580
of 364,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#59
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.