You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Central arteriovenous anastomosis for the treatment of patients with uncontrolled hypertension (the ROX CONTROL HTN study): a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(14)62053-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melvin D Lobo, Paul A Sobotka, Alice Stanton, John R Cockcroft, Neil Sulke, Eamon Dolan, Markus van der Giet, Joachim Hoyer, Stephen S Furniss, John P Foran, Adam Witkowski, Andrzej Januszewicz, Danny Schoors, Konstantinos Tsioufis, Benno J Rensing, Benjamin Scott, G André Ng, Christian Ott, Roland E Schmieder, for the ROX CONTROL HTN Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 17% |
| Spain | 6 | 8% |
| France | 4 | 6% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 2 | 3% |
| Morocco | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 22% |
| Scientists | 9 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Botswana | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 168 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 11% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 25% |
| Unknown | 44 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 59 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2022.
All research outputs
#244,369
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,723
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,788
of 359,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#28
of 540 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 540 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.