You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change: a cluster randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, May 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60095-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David A Kim, Alison R Hwong, Derek Stafford, D Alex Hughes, A James O'Malley, James H Fowler, Nicholas A Christakis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 216 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 43 | 20% |
| United States | 40 | 19% |
| Australia | 21 | 10% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 9% |
| Unknown | 68 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 120 | 56% |
| Scientists | 67 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 23 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 2% |
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 435 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 89 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 88 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 13% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 18% |
| Unknown | 88 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 87 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 12% |
| Psychology | 42 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 29 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 109 | 24% |
| Unknown | 115 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 202. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2024.
All research outputs
#200,141
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#2,347
of 43,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,008
of 280,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#26
of 455 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 43,048 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 455 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.