↓ Skip to main content

We can do better in building society WillHuttonHow Good We Can Be: Ending the Mercenary Society and Building a Great Country2015Little Brown9781408705315304£16·99

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, June 2015
Altmetric Badge
42

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
49 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
We can do better in building society WillHuttonHow Good We Can Be: Ending the Mercenary Society and Building a Great Country2015Little Brown9781408705315304£16·99
Published in
The Lancet, June 2015
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)61149-7
Authors

Michael Marmot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 11%
United States 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 22%
Lecturer 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Psychology 1 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2018.
All research outputs
#990,607
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#7,689
of 42,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,870
of 281,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#122
of 472 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 472 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.