↓ Skip to main content

National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet Global Health, January 2016
Altmetric Badge
128

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
48 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
734 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1457 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis
Published in
The Lancet Global Health, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/s2214-109x(15)00275-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hannah Blencowe, Simon Cousens, Fiorella Bianchi Jassir, Lale Say, Doris Chou, Colin Mathers, Dan Hogan, Suhail Shiekh, Zeshan U Qureshi, Danzhen You, Joy E Lawn, Jun Zhu, Juan Liang, Yi Mu, Xiaohong Li, Anthony Costello, Tim Colbourn, Edward Fottrell, Audrey Prost, David Osrin, Carina King, Melissa Neuman, Neena Shah More, Kishwar Azad, Dharma Manandhar, Nirmala Nair, Prasanta Tripathy, Rajesh Kumar, Ariarathinam Newtonraj, Manmeet Kaur, Madhu Gupta, LK Dhaliwal, Neelam Aggarwal, Venkateshashan, Deepak Chawla, Anju Hurja, Poonam Shivkumar, Manish Jain, Geeta Gathwala, Smiti Nanda, Shashi Gupta, Sangeeta Singal, Raj Kumar, Sujata Sharma, Manjit Mohi, Santish Minhas, Rajendra Prasad, Suresh Verma, Neena Raina, Aimable Musafi Li, Beena Varghese, Robert Pattison, Jane Hirst, Peter Waiswa, Daniel Kadobera, Sanni Kujala, Anna Bergstrom, Tambosi Phiri, Jennifer A Hall, Louise T Day, Stacy L Saha, Shafi Ul Alam, Anisur Rahman, Shams El-Arifeen, Sayed Rubayet, Ahmed Ali Hassan, Lucy Smith, Bradley N Manktelow, Elizabeth S Draper, Nanbert Zhong, Jans Langhoff-Roos, Vicki Flenady, Kärt Allvee, Mika Gissler, Nicholas Lack, Sonam Wangdi, Jan Cap, Zuzana Podmanicka, Katarzyna Szamotulska, Chantal Hukkelhoven, Joyce Dijs-Elsinga, Theopisti Kyprianou, Kari Klungsøyr, Flor de Maria Herandez, Ala Curteanu, Henrique Barros, Sofia Correia, Shorena Tsiklauri, Ellen Lundqvist, Tinga Fulbert Ilboudo, Abdouli Bah, Lamin Jawara, Jennifer Zeitlin, Jelena Isakova, Olav Poppe

Abstract

Previous estimates have highlighted a large global burden of stillbirths, with an absence of reliable data from regions where most stillbirths occur. The Every Newborn Action Plan (ENAP) targets national stillbirth rates (SBRs) of 12 or fewer stillbirths per 1000 births by 2030. We estimate SBRs and numbers for 195 countries, including trends from 2000 to 2015. We collated SBR data meeting prespecified inclusion criteria from national routine or registration systems, nationally representative surveys, and other data sources identified through a systematic review, web-based searches, and consultation with stillbirth experts. We modelled SBR (≥28 weeks' gestation) for 195 countries with restricted maximum likelihood estimation with country-level random effects. Uncertainty ranges were obtained through a bootstrap approach. Data from 157 countries (2207 datapoints) met the inclusion criteria, a 90% increase from 2009 estimates. The estimated average global SBR in 2015 was 18·4 per 1000 births, down from 24·7 in 2000 (25·5% reduction). In 2015, an estimated 2·6 million (uncertainty range 2·4-3·0 million) babies were stillborn, giving a 19% decline in numbers since 2000 with the slowest progress in sub-Saharan Africa. 98% of all stillbirths occur in low-income and middle-income countries; 77% in south Asia and sub-Saharan Africa. Progress in reducing the large worldwide stillbirth burden remains slow and insufficient to meet national targets such as for ENAP. Stillbirths are increasingly being counted at a local level, but countries and the global community must further improve the quality and comparability of data, and ensure that this is more clearly linked to accountability processes including the Sustainable Development Goals. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through Save the Children's Saving Newborn Lives programme to The London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 1452 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 315 22%
Student > Bachelor 156 11%
Researcher 124 9%
Student > Postgraduate 113 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 106 7%
Other 264 18%
Unknown 379 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 452 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 258 18%
Social Sciences 85 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 2%
Other 183 13%
Unknown 424 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#325,247
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Global Health
#288
of 3,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,811
of 402,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Global Health
#1
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.