↓ Skip to main content

Synergy in traditional Chinese medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Oncology, February 2016
Altmetric Badge
1

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Synergy in traditional Chinese medicine
Published in
Lancet Oncology, February 2016
DOI 10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00557-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tianhan Xue

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 32%
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Mathematics 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2016.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#6,622
of 6,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,814
of 406,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#131
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.