You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
WHO reveals its shopping list for weapons against Zika
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00390-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John Maurice |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 15% |
| United States | 4 | 12% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Belgium | 1 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 58% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 27% |
| Scientists | 3 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 6 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,496,582
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#10,363
of 42,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,935
of 408,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#172
of 479 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 479 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.