You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Zika virus in the dock
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Infectious Diseases, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1473-3099(16)00085-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
The Lancet Infectious Diseases |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 19% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 30% |
| Unknown | 7 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#3,336,506
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#2,953
of 6,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,501
of 312,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#82
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.