You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Economists, universal health coverage, and non-communicable diseases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)00510-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Beaglehole, Ruth Bonita |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Argentina | 1 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Librarian | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 11% |
| Other | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2016.
All research outputs
#6,571,272
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#23,292
of 42,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,294
of 312,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#325
of 452 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 452 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.