You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Positive IgM for Zika virus in the cerebrospinal fluid of 30 neonates with microcephaly in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30253-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marli Tenorio Cordeiro, Lindomar J Pena, Carlos A Brito, Laura H Gil, Ernesto T Marques |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 63 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 15 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 6% |
| Brazil | 4 | 6% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Kenya | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 22 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 54% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 19% |
| Scientists | 10 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 5 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 243 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Professor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 58 | 23% |
| Unknown | 36 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 20 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 49 | 19% |
| Unknown | 51 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#659,212
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#5,689
of 42,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,723
of 314,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#107
of 469 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 469 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.