↓ Skip to main content

Hospital Preparations for Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Patients and Experience Gained from Admission of an Ebola Patient - Volume 22, Number 2—February 2016 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC

Overview of attention for article published in Emerging Infectious Diseases, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Hospital Preparations for Viral Hemorrhagic Fever Patients and Experience Gained from Admission of an Ebola Patient - Volume 22, Number 2—February 2016 - Emerging Infectious Diseases journal - CDC
Published in
Emerging Infectious Diseases, February 2016
DOI 10.3201/eid2202.151393
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.J. Mark Haverkort, A.L.C. Minderhoud, Jelte D.D. Wind, Luke P.H. Leenen, Andy I.M. Hoepelman, Pauline M. Ellerbroek

Abstract

The Major Incident Hospital of the University Medical Centre of Utrecht has a longstanding history of preparing for the management of highly pathogenic and infectious organisms. An assessment of the hospital's preparations for an outbreak of viral hemorrhagic fever and its experience during admission of a patient with Ebola virus disease showed that the use of the buddy system, frequent training, and information sessions for staff and their relatives greatly increased the sense of safety and motivation among staff. Differing procedures among ambulance services limited the number of services used for transporting patients. Waste management was the greatest concern, and destruction of waste had to be outsourced. The admission of an Ebola patient proceeded without incident but led to considerable demands on staff. The maximum time allowed for wearing personal protective equipment was 45 minutes to ensure safety, and an additional 20 minutes was needed for recovery.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 20%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Other 8 10%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 14%
Engineering 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 22 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,864,417
of 24,374,350 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#5,595
of 9,457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,448
of 406,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Infectious Diseases
#90
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,374,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.