You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Frequent mutation of histone-modifying genes in non-Hodgkin lymphoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature10351 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan D. Morin, Maria Mendez-Lago, Andrew J. Mungall, Rodrigo Goya, Karen L. Mungall, Richard D. Corbett, Nathalie A. Johnson, Tesa M. Severson, Readman Chiu, Matthew Field, Shaun Jackman, Martin Krzywinski, David W. Scott, Diane L. Trinh, Jessica Tamura-Wells, Sa Li, Marlo R. Firme, Sanja Rogic, Malachi Griffith, Susanna Chan, Oleksandr Yakovenko, Irmtraud M. Meyer, Eric Y. Zhao, Duane Smailus, Michelle Moksa, Suganthi Chittaranjan, Lisa Rimsza, Angela Brooks-Wilson, John J. Spinelli, Susana Ben-Neriah, Barbara Meissner, Bruce Woolcock, Merrill Boyle, Helen McDonald, Angela Tam, Yongjun Zhao, Allen Delaney, Thomas Zeng, Kane Tse, Yaron Butterfield, Inanç Birol, Rob Holt, Jacqueline Schein, Douglas E. Horsman, Richard Moore, Steven J. M. Jones, Joseph M. Connors, Martin Hirst, Randy D. Gascoyne, Marco A. Marra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 9% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | 5% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
| Scientists | 9 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 976 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 1% |
| Germany | 8 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Denmark | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| China | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | <1% |
| Unknown | 924 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 225 | 23% |
| Researcher | 207 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 94 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 80 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 53 | 5% |
| Other | 185 | 19% |
| Unknown | 132 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 314 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 221 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 200 | 20% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 2% |
| Other | 54 | 6% |
| Unknown | 149 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#783,770
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#28,503
of 98,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,955
of 134,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#204
of 897 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 897 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.