↓ Skip to main content

Bone Mineral Density Increases in HIV-Infected Children Treated With Long-term Combination Antiretroviral Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Infectious Diseases, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bone Mineral Density Increases in HIV-Infected Children Treated With Long-term Combination Antiretroviral Therapy
Published in
Clinical Infectious Diseases, October 2012
DOI 10.1093/cid/cis917
Pubmed ID
Authors

Madeleine J. Bunders, Olivier Frinking, Henriette J. Scherpbier, Lotus A. van Arnhem, Berthe L. van Eck-Smit, Taco W. Kuijpers, Aeilko H. Zwinderman, Peter Reiss, Dasja Pajkrt

Abstract

The long-term treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children with combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) requires assessment of potential adverse effects, such as osteoporosis. Longitudinal data on bone mineral density (BMD) in HIV-infected children showed that cumulative treatment with cART had a positive impact on BMD over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 6%
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 31 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Researcher 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2013.
All research outputs
#14,600,553
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#12,401
of 16,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,203
of 202,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#94
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.