You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating Nucleosomes and Neutrophil Activation as Risk Factors for Deep Vein Thrombosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (Highwire), October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1161/atvbaha.112.300498 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maurits L. van Montfoort, Femke Stephan, Mandy N. Lauw, Barbara A. Hutten, Gerard J. Van Mierlo, Shabnam Solati, Saskia Middeldorp, Joost C.M. Meijers, Sacha Zeerleder |
| Abstract |
The formation of neutrophil extracellular traps and the exposure of nucleosomes on these neutrophil extracellular traps contribute to coagulation activation and the propagation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in animal models. However, no data are available on the role of neutrophil extracellular traps or nucleosomes in patients with thrombosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 19% |
| Researcher | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 38 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (Highwire)
#5,387
of 6,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,341
of 202,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology (Highwire)
#35
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.