↓ Skip to main content

Resveratrol prevents renal lipotoxicity and inhibits mesangial cell glucotoxicity in a manner dependent on the AMPK–SIRT1–PGC1α axis in db/db mice

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resveratrol prevents renal lipotoxicity and inhibits mesangial cell glucotoxicity in a manner dependent on the AMPK–SIRT1–PGC1α axis in db/db mice
Published in
Diabetologia, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00125-012-2747-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. Y. Kim, J. H. Lim, H. H. Youn, Y. A. Hong, K. S. Yang, H. S. Park, S. Chung, S. H. Koh, S. J. Shin, B. S. Choi, H. W. Kim, Y. S. Kim, J. H. Lee, Y. S. Chang, C. W. Park

Abstract

Many of the effects of resveratrol are consistent with the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), silent information regulator T1 (SIRT1) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)γ co-activator 1α (PGC-1α), which play key roles in the regulation of lipid and glucose homeostasis, and in the control of oxidative stress. We investigated whether resveratrol has protective effects on the kidney in type 2 diabetes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 19%
Student > Master 17 15%
Researcher 13 12%
Other 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 22 20%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 11%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2012.
All research outputs
#7,418,854
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#2,823
of 5,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,005
of 183,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#16
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,025 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.