↓ Skip to main content

Effects of dynamic ischaemic training on human skeletal muscle dimensions

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of dynamic ischaemic training on human skeletal muscle dimensions
Published in
European Journal of Applied Physiology, May 2000
DOI 10.1007/s004210050663
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. T. Nygren, C. J. Sundberg, M. Esbjörnsson-Liljedahl, E. Jansson, L. Kaijser

Abstract

The effect of training under conditions of local leg ischaemia on muscle area and fibre dimensions was studied in nine males. Leg ischaemia was induced by enclosing the legs in a pressure chamber and sealing the opening with a rubber membrane at the level of the crotch. Air pressure over the legs was 50 mmHg. The subjects performed 16 sessions (45 min) of one-legged supine strenuous ischaemic training during 4 weeks. Exercise intensity was maintained as high as possible during the whole session. The contralateral leg served as a control leg and remained passive during exercise. Before and after the training period, muscle fibre dimensions were determined from biopsy samples taken from the m. vastus lateralis, and leg muscle dimensions were assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In the trained leg, mean fibre area increased by 12% (P < 0.05). The MRI-assessed cross-sectional area of the vastus group increased by 4% (P = 0.01). In the control leg, mean fibre area and the cross-sectional area of the vastus group were unchanged, while those of the adductor muscle group decreased by 4% (P < 0.05). It is concluded that a short period of strenuous ischaemic endurance training increases the cross-sectional area of the ischaemically trained muscle group, as measured both by MRI and from muscle biopsy samples. In contrast, the adductor muscles in the contralateral thigh showed a decreased cross-sectional area (as assessed by MRI), possibly due to the effects of the strenuous contralateral training, by mechanisms that have yet to be identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
Hungary 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 26%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Professor 6 11%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 4 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 22 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 5 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#4,069
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,983
of 40,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.