↓ Skip to main content

Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetologia, February 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
507 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study
Published in
Diabetologia, February 2008
DOI 10.1007/s00125-008-0940-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Prompers, N. Schaper, J. Apelqvist, M. Edmonds, E. Jude, D. Mauricio, L. Uccioli, V. Urbancic, K. Bakker, P. Holstein, A. Jirkovska, A. Piaggesi, G. Ragnarson-Tennvall, H. Reike, M. Spraul, K. Van Acker, J. Van Baal, F. Van Merode, I. Ferreira, M. Huijberts

Abstract

Outcome data on individuals with diabetic foot ulcers are scarce, especially in those with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We therefore examined the clinical characteristics that best predict poor outcome in a large population of diabetic foot ulcer patients and examined whether such predictors differ between patients with and without PAD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 501 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 11%
Student > Postgraduate 53 10%
Researcher 50 10%
Student > Master 46 9%
Student > Bachelor 46 9%
Other 119 23%
Unknown 138 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 207 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 9%
Engineering 16 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Other 60 12%
Unknown 149 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,481,315
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Diabetologia
#798
of 5,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,547
of 99,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetologia
#3
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,621 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.