↓ Skip to main content

The carbon count of 2000 years of rice cultivation

Overview of attention for article published in Global Change Biology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The carbon count of 2000 years of rice cultivation
Published in
Global Change Biology, December 2012
DOI 10.1111/gcb.12080
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karsten Kalbitz, Klaus Kaiser, Sabine Fiedler, Angelika Kölbl, Wulf Amelung, Tino Bräuer, Zhihong Cao, Axel Don, Piet Grootes, Reinhold Jahn, Lorenz Schwark, Vanessa Vogelsang, Livia Wissing, Ingrid Kögel‐Knabner

Abstract

More than 50% of the world's population feeds on rice. Soils used for rice production are mostly managed under submerged conditions (paddy soils). This management, which favors carbon sequestration, potentially decouples surface from subsurface carbon cycling. The objective of this study was to elucidate the long-term rates of carbon accrual in surface and subsurface soil horizons relative to those of soils under nonpaddy management. We assessed changes in total soil organic as well as of inorganic carbon stocks along a 2000-year chronosequence of soils under paddy and adjacent nonpaddy management in the Yangtze delta, China. The initial organic carbon accumulation phase lasts much longer and is more intensive than previously assumed, e.g., by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Paddy topsoils accumulated 170-178 kg organic carbon ha(-1) a(-1) in the first 300 years; subsoils lost 29-84 kg organic carbon ha(-1) a(-1) during this period of time. Subsoil carbon losses were largest during the first 50 years after land embankment and again large beyond 700 years of cultivation, due to inorganic carbonate weathering and the lack of organic carbon replenishment. Carbon losses in subsoils may therefore offset soil carbon gains or losses in the surface soils. We strongly recommend including subsoils into global carbon accounting schemes, particularly for paddy fields.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 3 3%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Vietnam 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 92 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Researcher 20 20%
Student > Master 11 11%
Professor 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 32 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 13%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 28 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,008,800
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Global Change Biology
#2,532
of 6,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,093
of 291,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Change Biology
#28
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.