You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decision aids to improve informed decision‐making in pregnancy care: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1471-0528.12060 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
F Vlemmix, JK Warendorf, AN Rosman, M Kok, BWJ Mol, JM Morris, N Nassar |
| Abstract |
Rapid development in health care has resulted in an increasing number of screening and treatment options. Consequently, there is an urgency to provide people with relevant information about benefits and risks of healthcare options in an unbiased way. Decision aids help people to make decisions by providing unbiased non-directive research evidence about all treatment options. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Canada | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 82% |
| Scientists | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 14% |
| Researcher | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 46 | 22% |
| Unknown | 45 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 7% |
| Psychology | 13 | 6% |
| Decision Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 60 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,719,321
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#1,094
of 6,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,065
of 193,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#14
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.