You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The resolution of inflammation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Immunology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nri3362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher D. Buckley, Derek W. Gilroy, Charles N. Serhan, Brigitta Stockinger, Paul P. Tak |
| Abstract |
In 2012, Nature Reviews Immunology organized a conference that brought together scientists and clinicians from both academia and industry to discuss one of the most pressing questions in medicine--how do we turn off rampant, undesirable inflammation? There is a growing appreciation that, similarly to the initiation of inflammation, the resolution of inflammation is an intricate and active process. Can we therefore harness the mediators involved in resolution responses to treat patients with chronic inflammatory or autoimmune diseases? Here, we ask five of the speakers from the conference to share their thoughts on this emerging field. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 568 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 536 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 119 | 21% |
| Researcher | 118 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 73 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 100 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 137 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 122 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 69 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 63 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 9% |
| Unknown | 95 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,081,687
of 24,380,426 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Immunology
#823
of 2,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,208
of 285,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Immunology
#6
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 42.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,359 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.