↓ Skip to main content

Gut-directed hypnotherapy for functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome in children: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Disease in Childhood, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gut-directed hypnotherapy for functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome in children: a systematic review
Published in
Archives of Disease in Childhood, December 2012
DOI 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302906
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliette M T M Rutten, Johannes B Reitsma, Arine M Vlieger, Marc A Benninga

Abstract

Gut directed hypnotherapy (HT) is shown to be effective in adult functional abdominal pain (FAP) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients. We performed a systematic review to assess efficacy of HT in paediatric FAP/IBS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 133 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 15%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Student > Master 13 9%
Other 9 6%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 34 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 40%
Psychology 21 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 40 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,061,976
of 25,137,221 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#363
of 7,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,347
of 290,948 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood
#4
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,137,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,668 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,948 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.