You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Recessive mutations in EPG5 cause Vici syndrome, a multisystem disorder with defective autophagy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.2497 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Cullup, Ay Lin Kho, Carlo Dionisi-Vici, Birgit Brandmeier, Frances Smith, Zoe Urry, Michael A Simpson, Shu Yau, Enrico Bertini, Verity McClelland, Mohammed Al-Owain, Stefan Koelker, Christian Koerner, Georg F Hoffmann, Frits A Wijburg, Amber E ten Hoedt, R Curtis Rogers, David Manchester, Rie Miyata, Masaharu Hayashi, Elizabeth Said, Doriette Soler, Peter M Kroisel, Christian Windpassinger, Francis M Filloux, Salwa Al-Kaabi, Jozef Hertecant, Miguel Del Campo, Stefan Buk, Istvan Bodi, Hans-Hilmar Goebel, Caroline A Sewry, Stephen Abbs, Shehla Mohammed, Dragana Josifova, Mathias Gautel, Heinz Jungbluth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 41 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,232,080
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#6,886
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,460
of 290,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#58
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.