You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genome-wide association analysis of anti-TNF drug response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202405 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maša Umiċeviċ Mirkov, Jing Cui, Sita H Vermeulen, Eli A Stahl, Erik J M Toonen, Remco R Makkinje, Annette T Lee, Tom W J Huizinga, Renee Allaart, Anne Barton, Xavier Mariette, Corinne Richard Miceli, Lindsey A Criswell, Paul P Tak, Niek de Vries, Saedis Saevarsdottir, Leonid Padyukov, S Louis Bridges, Dirk-Jan van Schaardenburg, Tim L Jansen, Ellen A J Dutmer, Mart A F J van de Laar, Pilar Barrera, Timothy R D J Radstake, Piet L C M van Riel, Hans Scheffer, Barbara Franke, Han G Brunner, Robert M Plenge, Peter K Gregersen, Henk-Jan Guchelaar, Marieke J H Coenen |
| Abstract |
Treatment strategies blocking tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) have proven very successful in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a significant subset of patients does not respond for unknown reasons. Currently, there are no means of identifying these patients before treatment. This study was aimed at identifying genetic factors predicting anti-TNF treatment outcome in patients with RA using a genome-wide association approach. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Peru | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 21% |
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 20 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2017.
All research outputs
#4,549,786
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#2,535
of 7,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,148
of 278,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#37
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.