↓ Skip to main content

Aberrant p53 protein expression is associated with an increased risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's oesophagus

Overview of attention for article published in Gut, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aberrant p53 protein expression is associated with an increased risk of neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett's oesophagus
Published in
Gut, December 2012
DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303594
Pubmed ID
Authors

Florine Kastelein, Katharina Biermann, Ewout W Steyerberg, Joanne Verheij, Marit Kalisvaart, Leendert H J Looijenga, Hans A Stoop, Laurens Walter, Ernst J Kuipers, Manon C W Spaander, Marco J Bruno, on behalf of the ProBar-study group

Abstract

The value of surveillance for patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is under discussion given the overall low incidence of neoplastic progression and lack of discriminative tests for risk stratification. Histological diagnosis of low-grade dysplasia (LGD) is the only accepted predictor for progression to date, but has a low predictive value. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the value of p53 immunohistochemistry for predicting neoplastic progression in patients with BO.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 85 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Student > Master 9 10%
Other 8 9%
Professor 8 9%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 22 25%
Unknown 15 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 61%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Decision Sciences 1 1%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 20 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,904,224
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Gut
#2,364
of 6,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,539
of 284,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut
#16
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.