↓ Skip to main content

Symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps

Overview of attention for article published in The Laryngoscope, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps
Published in
The Laryngoscope, December 2012
DOI 10.1002/lary.23671
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dirk A. E. Dietz de Loos, Claire Hopkins, Wytske J. Fokkens

Abstract

In this study we analyzed differences in symptoms scored between chronic rhinosinusitis patients with (CRSwNP) and without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). According to the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps, CRSwNP and CRSsNP diagnoses are defined by clinical criteria supported with endoscopy. We wanted to know if it is possible to make an accurate distinction between patients with and without nasal polyps based on clinical impression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Master 9 10%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 32 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 36 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,304,457
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from The Laryngoscope
#1,252
of 7,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,748
of 295,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Laryngoscope
#10
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.