You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcomes of Treatment for Achalasia Depend on Manometric Subtype
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastroenterology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.12.027 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wout O. Rohof, Renato Salvador, Vito Annese, Stanislas Bruley des Varannes, Stanislas Chaussade, Mario Costantini, J. Ignasi Elizalde, Marianne Gaudric, André J. Smout, Jan Tack, Olivier R. Busch, Giovanni Zaninotto, Guy E. Boeckxstaens |
| Abstract |
Patients with achalasia are treated with either pneumatic dilation (PD) or laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), which have comparable rates of success. We evaluated whether manometric subtype was associated with response to treatment in a large population of patients treated with either PD or LHM (the European achalasia trial). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 11% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 23% |
| Unknown | 36 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 125 | 67% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2022.
All research outputs
#7,896,290
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterology
#5,608
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,127
of 288,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterology
#26
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.