You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The consequences of faking anger in negotiations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.015 |
| Authors |
Stéphane Côté, Ivona Hideg, Gerben A. van Kleef |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 35% |
| Japan | 2 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 85% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 60 | 33% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 45 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Unknown | 37 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 197. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#201,018
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
#96
of 2,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,280
of 204,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,373 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.