You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rethinking wedges
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/8/1/011001 |
| Authors |
Steven J Davis, Long Cao, Ken Caldeira, Martin I Hoffert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 41% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 61% |
| Scientists | 12 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 22% |
| Researcher | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Professor | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 44 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 73 | 31% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 33 | 14% |
| Engineering | 26 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 40 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2021.
All research outputs
#349,925
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#551
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,344
of 290,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#4
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.