↓ Skip to main content

Concentration and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the ambient air of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concentration and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the ambient air of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Published in
Natural Hazards, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11069-016-2575-7
Authors

Puteri Nurafidah Hosaini, Md Firoz Khan, Nur Ili Hamizah Mustaffa, Norhaniza Amil, Noorlin Mohamad, Shoffian Amin Jaafar, Mohd Shahrul Mohd Nadzir, Mohd Talib Latif

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 39%
Engineering 4 7%
Chemical Engineering 3 5%
Chemistry 3 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#12,769,362
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#1,133
of 1,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,529
of 336,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#28
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.