↓ Skip to main content

Knee extension range of motion and self-report physical function in total knee arthroplasty: mediating effects of knee extensor strength

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knee extension range of motion and self-report physical function in total knee arthroplasty: mediating effects of knee extensor strength
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-14-33
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yong-Hao Pua, Peck-Hoon Ong, Hwei-Chi Chong, William Yeo, Celia Tan, Ngai-Nung Lo

Abstract

Knee extensor strength and knee extension range of motion (ROM) are important predictors of physical function in patients with a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the relationship between the two knee measures remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine whether changes in knee extensor strength mediate the association between changes in knee extension ROM and self-report physical function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 64 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 13 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 20%
Sports and Recreations 7 11%
Engineering 3 5%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#7,171,539
of 25,045,181 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,339
of 4,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,459
of 297,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#21
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,045,181 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.